When I read the documents relative to the Modernism, as it was defined by Saint Pius X, and when I compare them to the documents of the II Vatican Council, I cannot help being bewildered. For what was condemned as heresy in 1906 was proclaimed as what is and should be from now on the doctrine and method of the Church. In other words, the modernists of 1906 were, somewhat, precursors to me. My masters were part of them. My parents taught me Modernism. How could Saint Pius X reject those that now seem to be my precursors?
read quotesdocuments quotesrelative quotesmodernism quotesdefined quotessaint quotespius quotesx quotescompare quotesii quotesvatican quotescouncil quotesbewildered quotescondemned quotesheresy quotes1906 quotesproclaimed quotesdoctrine quotesmethod quoteschurch quoteswords quotesmodernists quotesprecursors quotesmasters quotespart quotesparents quotestaught quotesmodernism quotesx quotesreject quotesprecursors quotes
The intention of Paul VI with regard to what is commonly called the Mass, was to reform the Catholic liturgy in such a way that it should almost coincide with the Protestant liturgy - but what is curious is that Paul VI did that to get as close as possible to the Protestant Lord's supper... there was with Paul VI an ecumenical intention to remove, or at least to correct, or at least to relax, what was too Catholic, in the traditional sense, and, I repeat, to get the Catholic Mass closer to the Calvinist Mass.
intention quotespaul quotesvi quotesregard quotescommonly quotescalled quotesmass quotesreform quotescatholic quotesliturgy quotescoincide quotesprotestant quotescurious quotesclose quoteslords quotessupper quotesecumenical quotesremove quotescorrect quotesrelax quotescatholic quotestraditional quotessense quotesrepeat quotesmass quotescloser quotescalvinist quotesmass quotes