Karl R. Popper Quotes

Authors: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Categories: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
While differing widely in the various little bits we know, in our infinite ignorance we are all equal. -Karl R. Popper
while-differing-widely-in-various-little-bits-we-know-in-our-infinite-ignorance-we-are-all-equal-karl-r-popper

Cite

APA
Karl R. Popper Quotes. (n.d.). Jar of Quotes. Retrieved , from JarofQuotes.com Web site: https://www.jarofquotes.com/view.php?id=while-differing-widely-in-various-little-bits-we-know-in-our-infinite-ignorance-we-are-all-equal-karl-r-popper

Chicago
Karl R. Popper Quotes. Jar of Quotes, 2019. https://www.jarofquotes.com/view.php?id=while-differing-widely-in-various-little-bits-we-know-in-our-infinite-ignorance-we-are-all-equal-karl-r-popper, accessed .

MLA
"Karl R. Popper Quotes." Jar of Quotes, 2019. . https://www.jarofquotes.com/view.php?id=while-differing-widely-in-various-little-bits-we-know-in-our-infinite-ignorance-we-are-all-equal-karl-r-popper

Related Quotes
The difficulties connected with my criterion of demarcation (D) are important, but must not be exaggerated. It is vague, since it is a methodological rule, and since the demarcation between science and nonscience is vague. But it is more than sharp enough to make a distinction between many physical theories on the one hand, and metaphysical theories, such as psychoanalysis, or Marxism (in its present form), on the other. This is, of course, one of my main theses; and nobody who has not understood it can be said to have understood my theory. The situation with Marxism is, incidentally, very different from that with psychoanalysis. Marxism was once a scientific theory: it predicted that capitalism would lead to increasing misery and, through a more or less mild revolution, to socialism; it predicted that this would happen first in the technically highest developed countries; and it predicted that the technical evolution of the 'means of production' would lead to social, political, and ideological developments, rather than the other way round. But the (so-called) socialist revolution came first in one of the technically backward countries. And instead of the means of production producing a new ideology, it was Lenin's and Stalin's ideology that Russia must push forward with its industrialization ('Socialism is dictatorship of the proletariat plus electrification') which promoted the new development of the means of production. Thus one might say that Marxism was once a science, but one which was refuted by some of the facts which happened to clash with its predictions (I have here mentioned just a few of these facts). However, Marxism is no longer a science; for it broke the methodological rule that we must accept falsification, and it immunized itself against the most blatant refutations of its predictions. Ever since then, it can be described only as nonscience-as a metaphysical dream, if you like, married to a cruel reality. Psychoanalysis is a very different case. It is an interesting psychological metaphysics (and no doubt there is some truth in it, as there is so often in metaphysical ideas), but it never was a science. There may be lots of people who are Freudian or Adlerian cases: Freud himself was clearly a Freudian case, and Adler an Adlerian case. But what prevents their theories from being scientific in the sense here described is, very simply, that they do not exclude any physically possible human behaviour. Whatever anybody may do is, in principle, explicable in Freudian or Adlerian terms. (Adler's break with Freud was more Adlerian than Freudian, but Freud never looked on it as a refutation of his theory.) The point is very clear. Neither Freud nor Adler excludes any particular person's acting in any particular way, whatever the outward circumstances. Whether a man sacrificed his life to rescue a drowning, child (a case of sublimation) or whether he murdered the child by drowning him (a case of repression) could not possibly be predicted or excluded by Freud's theory; the theory was compatible with everything that could happen-even without any special immunization treatment. Thus while Marxism became non-scientific by its adoption of an immunizing strategy, psychoanalysis was immune to start with, and remained so. In contrast, most physical theories are pretty free of immunizing tactics and highly falsifiable to start with. As a rule, they exclude an infinity of conceivable possibilities.

Karl R. Popper
the-difficulties-connected-with-my-criterion-demarcation-d-are-important-but-must-not-be-exaggerated-it-is-vague-since-it-is-methodological-rule-since-demarcation-between-science
difficulties quotesconnected quotescriterion quotesdemarcation quotesd quotesimportant quotesexaggerated quotesvague quotesmethodological quotesrule quotesscience quotesnonscience quotesvague quotessharp quotesmake quotesdistinction quotesphysical quotestheories quoteshand quotesmetaphysical quotestheories quotespsychoanalysis quotesmarxism quotespresent quotesform quotesmain quotestheses quotesunderstood quotestheory quotessituation quotesincidentally quotespsychoanalysis quotesscientific quotestheory quotespredicted quotescapitalism quoteslead quotesincreasing quotesmisery quotesmild quotesrevolution quotessocialism quoteshappen quotestechnically quoteshighest quotesdeveloped quotescountries quotestechnical quotesevolution quotesmeans quotesproduction quotessocial quotespolitical quotesideological quotesdevelopments quotesround quotessocalled quotessocialist quotesrevolution quotesbackward quotescountries quotesmeans quotesproduction quotesproducing quotesideology quoteslenins quotesstalins quotesideology quotesrussia quotespush quotesforward quotesindustrialization quotessocialism quotesdictatorship quotesproletariat quoteselectrification quotespromoted quotesdevelopment quotesproduction quotesscience quotesrefuted quotesfacts quoteshappened quotesclash quotespredictions quotesmentioned quotesfacts quoteslonger quotesscience quotesbroke quotesrule quotesaccept quotesfalsification quotesimmunized quotesblatant quotesrefutations quotespredictions quotesnonscienceas quotesdream quotesmarried quotescruel quotesreality quotespsychoanalysis quotescase quotesinteresting quotespsychological quotesmetaphysics quotesdoubt quotestruth quotesideas quotesscience quoteslots quotespeople quotesfreudian quotesadlerian quotescases quotesfreud quotescase quotesadler quotesprevents quotessense quotessimply quotesexclude quotesphysically quoteshuman quotesbehaviour quotesprinciple quotesexplicable quotesterms quotesadlers quotesbreak quotesfreudian quoteslooked quotesrefutation quotestheory quotespoint quotesclear quotesexcludes quotespersons quotesacting quotesoutward quotescircumstances quotesman quotessacrificed quoteslife quotesrescue quotesdrowning quoteschild quotescase quotessublimation quotesmurdered quotesdrowning quotesrepression quotespossibly quotesexcluded quotesfreuds quotestheory quotestheory quotescompatible quoteshappeneven quotesspecial quotesimmunization quotestreatment quotesnonscientific quotesadoption quotesimmunizing quotesstrategy quotespsychoanalysis quotesimmune quotesstart quotesremained quotescontrast quotespretty quotesfree quotestactics quoteshighly quotesfalsifiable quotesinfinity quotesconceivable quotespossibilities quotes
The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato. Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. - In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.

Karl R. Popper
science-may-be-described-as-art-systematic-oversimplification-karl-r-popper
science-is-most-significant-as-one-greatest-spiritual-adventures-that-man-has-yet-known-karl-r-popper
no-book-can-ever-be-finished-while-working-on-it-we-learn-just-enough-to-find-it-immature-moment-we-turn-away-from-it-karl-r-popper
denying-realism-amounts-to-megalomania-karl-r-popper
?Earn cash when you save a quote by clicking
EARNED Load...
LEVEL : Load...