Inflicting Quotes

Authors: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Categories: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
killing-inflicting-the-most-intense-suffering
for-death-by-self-inflicting-gunshot-press-5
sovereignty-must-not-be-used-for-inflicting-harm-on-anyone-whether-citizen-foreigner-ludwig-von-mises
i-cannot-be-with-someone-who-takes-pleasure-in-inflicting-pain-on-me-someone-who-cant-love-me-e-l-james
i-cannot-be-with-someone-who-takes-pleasure-in-inflicting-pain-on-me-someone-who-cant-love-me-el-james
why-bother-inflicting-enormous-pain-on-yourself-when-sooner-later-life-would-certainly-get-around-to-doing-it-for-you-jeff-lindsay
nothing-man-suffers-will-prevent-him-from-inflicting-suffering-on-others-indeed-it-will-teach-him-way-barry-unsworth
children-enjoy-inflicting-pain-until-unhappiness-teaches-them-tenderness-mason-cooley
it-is-nature-human-that-we-tend-to-pass-our-pain-along-as-if-we-could-get-rid-it-by-inflicting-equal-hurt-on-someone-else-robin-hobb
we-are-our-own-wicked-gods-with-little-gs-big-dicks-sadistic-constantly-inflicting-slow-demise-marilyn-manson
when-you-see-threat-you-just-cant-hope-for-best-in-this-day-age-where-terrorists-are-capable-inflicting-damage-on-homeland-george-w-bush
war-is-tragedy-its-not-pretty-in-my-opinion-there-are-no-winners-everybodys-victim-from-one-whos-suffering-pain-to-person-inflicting-it
there-is-not-more-powerful-weapon-upon-this-earth-capable-inflicting-more-damage-pain-suffering-than-betrayal-heart-mark-boyer
cyber-weapons-provide-tantalising-possibility-being-able-to-cripple-enemy-without-inflicting-lasting-damage-on-them
words-are-in-my-nothumble-opinion-our-most-inexhaustible-source-magic-capable-both-inflicting-injury-remedying-it-j-k-rowling
wit-is-a-weapon-jokes-are-a-masculine-way-of-inflicting-superiority-but-humor-is-the-pursuit-of-a-gentle-grin-usually-in-solitude
punk-funk-means-to-be-one-with-yourself-to-be-rebellious-aggressive-able-to-do-say-what-you-feel-at-all-times-without-inflicting-mental-spiritual-rick-james
when-humans-behave-murderously-such-as-inflicting-senseless-slaughter-innocents-in-warfare-we-like-to-blame-it-on-some-dark-animalistic-instinct
pillory-n-a-mechanical-device-for-inflicting-personal-distinction-prototype-modern-newspaper-conducted-by-persons-austere-virtues-blameless-lives-ambrose-bierce
to-oblige-friend-by-inflicting-injury-on-his-enemy-is-often-more-easy-than-to-confer-benefit-on-friend-himself-anthony-trollope
to-injure-an-opponent-is-to-injure-yourself-to-control-aggression-without-inflicting-injury-is-the-art-of-peace
unkind-people-imagine-themselves-to-be-inflicting-pain-on-someone-equally-unkind-marcel-proust
our-losseshave-reached-intolerable-level-the-enemy-air-force-played-decisive-role-in-inflicting-these-high-losses-karl-donitz
and-thats-just-beginning-more-more-conventional-wisdom-says-that-responsible-thing-is-to-make-unemployed-suffer-and-while-benefits-from-inflicting-pain-are-illusion-pain-itself-w
unkindness-is-inspired-by-hatred-anger-fuels-it-into-action-in-which-there-is-no-great-joy-it-would-take-sadism-to-turn-it-into-something-pleasurable-unkind-people-imagine-themse
childhood-was-germ-all-mistrust-you-were-cruelly-joked-upon-then-you-cruelly-joked-you-lost-remembrance-pain-through-inflicting-it-graham-greene
torture-when-inflicted-on-children-becomes-indefensible-even-among-those-who-believe-that-torture-is-defensible-practice-to-extract-information-case-for-inflicting-pain-abuse-upo
We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came and the prophecy didn't, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves. The roots of liberal democracy had held. Wherever else the terror had happened, we, at least, had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares. But we had forgotten that alongside Orwell's dark vision, there was another - slightly older, slightly less well known, equally chilling: Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Contrary to common belief even among the educated, Huxley and Orwell did not prophesy the same thing. Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley's vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think. What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we desire will ruin us. This book is about the possibility that Huxley, not Orwell, was right.

Neil Postman
we-were-keeping-our-eye-on-1984-when-year-came-prophecy-didnt-thoughtful-americans-sang-softly-in-praise-themselves-the-roots-liberal-democracy-had-held-wherever-else-terror-had-
desire-for-goodness-mister-reese-leads-to-earnestness-earnestness-in-turn-leads-to-sanctimonious-selfrighteousness-which-breeds-intolerance-upon-which-harsh-judgment-quickly-foll
It is their usual reaction; they employ not words and reasoned conversation or discourse to resolve problems, but the truncheon, the jackbooted foot, or the gun. Sophistication requires more competence and skill than mere thuggery. It is a harder, loftier charge to be civilised than to let the beast in man devour man. The enlightened mind knows that all is challengeable, questions all, and thus, learns and grows. The weak, narrow mind makes its beliefs - whatever form they take - sacrosanct, defending them with violence if necessary. Political extremists, much like religious zealots, are the latter. They destroy what they cannot convert. They annihilate those they cannot control or make conform. They have found no peace in life, no love, and so promote war and division, as emotional cripples - inflicting their own pain and misery and malignant stupidity on the world. Their language binds people together, but only by stirring the darkest excesses of the soul; language of hate, and intolerance, fear and conspiracy, and the need for vengeance. In war-scarred Europe, these cripples direct mass-psychology, and would make the world in their own likeness; mutilated by violence and tribalism and hate. They use language in its most evil, twisted form. They appeal to the lowest form of understanding, on a level I hesitate to allow for the term 'human intelligence' to be associated. Children, fertile minds ripe for molestation. Now they will be taught what to think, not how to think. Language, that twisted poison. It scars purity.

Daniel S. Fletcher
it-is-their-usual-reaction-they-employ-not-words-reasoned-conversation-discourse-to-resolve-problems-but-truncheon-jackbooted-foot-gun-sophistication-requires-more-competence-ski
Opposition to animal research ranges considerably in degree. 'Minimalists' tolerate animal research under certain conditions. They accept some kinds of research but wish to prohibit others depending on the probable value of the research, the amount of distress to the animal, and the type of animal. (Few people have serious qualms about hurting an insect, for example.) They favor firm regulations on research. The 'abolitionists' take a more extreme position and see no room for compromise. Abolitionists maintain that all animals have the same rights as humans. They regard killing an animal as murder, whether the intention is to eat it, use its fur, or gain scientific knowledge. Keeping an animal (presumably even a pet) in a cage is, in their view, slavery. Because animals cannot give informed consent to research, abolitionists insist it is wrong to use them in any way, regardless of the circumstances. According to one opponent of animal research, 'We have no moral option but to bring this research to a halt. Completely... We will not be satisfied until every cage is empty' (Regan, 1986, pp. 39-40). Advocates of this position sometimes claim that most animal research is painful and that it never leads to important results. However, for a true abolitionist, neither of those points really matters. Their moral imperative is that people have no right to use animals, even if the research is useful and even if it is painless. The disagreement between abolitionists and animal researchers is a dispute between two ethical positions: 'Never knowingly harm an innocent' and 'Sometimes a little harm leads to a greater good.' On the one hand, permitting research has the undeniable consequence of inflicting pain or distress. On the other hand, banning the use of animals for human purposes means a great setback in medical research as well as the end of animal-to-human transplants (e.g., using pig heart valves to help people with heart diseases) (Figure 1.12).

James W. Kalat
opposition-to-animal-research-ranges-considerably-in-degree-minimalists-tolerate-animal-research-under-certain-conditions-they-accept-some-kinds-research-but-wish-to-prohibit-oth
The chief care of the legislators [in the colonies of New England] was the maintenance of orderly conduct and good morals in the community: thus they constantly invaded the domain of conscience, and there was scarcely a sin which was no subject to magisterial censure. The reader is aware of the rigor with which these laws punished rape and adultery; intercourse between unmarried persons was likewise severely repressed. The judge was empowered to inflict either a pecuniary penalty, a whipping, or marriage, on the misdemeanants; and if the records of the old courts of New Haven may be believed, prosecutions of this kind were not unfrequent. We find a sentence, bearing date the 1st of May, 1660, inflicting a fine and reprimand on a young woman who was accused of using improper language, and of allowing herself to be kissed. The Code of 1650 abounds in preventive measures. It punishes idleness and drunkenness with severity. Innkeepers were forbidden to furnish more than certain quantities of liquor to each customer; and simple lying, whenever it may be injurious, is checked by a fine or a flogging. In other places, the legislator, entirely forgetting the great principles of religious toleration which he had himself demanded in Europe, makes attendance on divine service compulsory, and goes so far as to visit with severe punishment, and even with death, Christians who choose to worship God according to a ritual differing from his own. Sometimes, indeed, the zeal for regulation induces him to descend to the most frivolous particulars: thus a law is to be found in the same code which prohibits the use of tobacco. It must not be forgotten that these fantastical and vexatious laws were not imposed by authority, but that they were freely voted by all the persons interested in them, and that the manners of the community were even more austere and puritanical than the laws... These errors are no doubt discreditable to human reason; they attest the inferiority of our nature, which is incapable of laying firm hold upon what is true and just, and is often reduced to the alternative of two excesses. In strict connection with this penal legislation, which bears such striking marks of a narrow, sectarian spirit, and of those religious passions which had been warmed by persecution and were still fermenting among the people, a body of political laws is to be found, which, though written two hundred years ago, is still in advance of the liberties of our own age.

Alexis de Tocqueville
the-chief-care-legislators-in-colonies-new-england-was-maintenance-orderly-conduct-good-morals-in-community-thus-they-constantly-invaded-domain-conscience-there-was-scarcely-sin-
?Earn cash when you save a quote by clicking
EARNED Load...
LEVEL : Load...