Predisposition Quotes

Authors: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Categories: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
i-believe-people-may-have-predisposition-for-artistic-creativity-it-doesnt-mean-theyre-going-to-make-it-rita-dove
let-no-one-think-that-flexibility-predisposition-to-compromise-is-sign-weakness-sell-out
if-you-study-root-causes-business-disasters-over-over-youll-find-this-predisposition-toward-endeavors-that-offer-immediate-gratification-clayton-christensen
it-is-predisposition-human-nature-to-consider-unpleasant-idea-untrue-then-it-is-easy-to-find-arguments-against-it-sigmund-freud
during-college-i-realized-i-had-music-predisposition-really-got-involved-in-it-i-started-playing-bass-guitar-that-was-how-i-began-to-fit-in-ronnie-dunn
im-not-doctor-scientist-im-just-mom-but-i-do-think-theres-genetic-predisposition-there-are-environmental-triggers-i-feel-like-that-combination-in-my-childs-case-is-what-resulted-
they-who-passed-away-long-ago-still-exist-in-us-as-predisposition-as-burden-upon-our-fate-as-murmuring-blood-as-gesture-that-rises-up-from-depths-rainer-maria-rilke
i-am-school-that-believes-for-most-part-that-gays-are-born-not-made-that-is-i-believe-there-appears-to-be-significant-scientific-evidence-to-back-me-up-that-there-is-genetic-pred
makeup-ignites-psychological-transformation-both-wearer-observer-my-paintings-sought-to-locate-subject-art-within-manipulation-that-altered-predisposition
job-interviewing-is-just-skill-like-any-skill-some-people-have-more-predisposition-for-it-than-others
We have looked at some of the things that a female might do if she has been deserted by her mate. But these all have the air of making the best of a bad job. Is there anything a female can do to reduce the extent to which her mate exploits her in the first place? She has a strong card in her hand. She can refuse to copulate. She is in demand, in a seller's market. This is because she brings the dowry of a large, nutritious egg. A male who successfully copulates gains a valuable food reserve for his offspring. The female is potentially in a position to drive a hard bargain before she copulates. Once she has copulated she has played her ace - her egg has been committed to the male. It is all very well to talk about driving hard bargains, but we know very well it is not really like that. Is there any realistic way in which something equivalent to driving a hard bargain could evolve by natural selection? I shall consider two main possibilities, called the domestic-bliss strategy, the he-man strategy. The simplest version of the domestic-bliss strategy is this. The female looks the males over, and tries to spot signs of fidelity and domesticity in advance. There is bound to be variation in the population of males in their predisposition to be faithful husbands. If females could recognize such qualities in advance, they could benefit themselves by choosing males possessing them. One way for a female to do this is to play hard to get for a long time, to be coy. Any male who is not patient enough to wait until the female eventually consents to copulate is not likely to be a good bet as a faithful husband. By insisting on a long engagement period, a female weeds out casual suitors, and only finally copulates with a male who has proved his qualities of fidelity and perseverance in advance. Feminine coyness is in fact very common among animals, and so are prolonged courtship or engagement periods. As we have already seen, a long engagement can also benefit a male where there is a danger of his being duped into caring for another male's child.

Richard Dawkins
we-have-looked-at-some-things-that-female-might-do-if-she-has-been-deserted-by-her-mate-but-these-all-have-air-making-best-bad-job-is-there-anything-female-can-do-to-reduce-exten
For Aristotle the literary plot was analogous to the plot of the world in that both were eductions from the potency of matter. Sartre denies this for the world, and specifically denies, in the passage just referred to, that without potentiality there is no change. He reverts to the Megaric view of the matter, which Aristotle took such trouble to correct. But this is not our affair. The fact is that even if you believe in a Megaric world there is no such thing as a Megaric novel; not even Paterson. Change without potentiality in a novel is impossible, quite simply; though it is the hopeless aim of the cut-out writers, and the card-shuffle writers. A novel which really implemented this policy would properly be a chaos. No novel can avoid being in some sense what Aristotle calls 'a completed action.' This being so, all novels imitate a world of potentiality, even if this implies a philosophy disclaimed by their authors. They have a fixation on the eidetic imagery of beginning, middle, and end, potency and cause. Novels, then, have beginnings, ends, and potentiality, even if the world has not. In the same way it can be said that whereas there may be, in the world, no such thing as character, since a man is what he does and chooses freely what he does-and in so far as he claims that his acts are determined by psychological or other predisposition he is a fraud, le¢che, or salaud-in the novel there can be no just representation of this, for if the man were entirely free he might simply walk out of the story, and if he had no character we should not recognize him. This is true in spite of the claims of the doctrinaire nouveau roman school to have abolished character. And Sartre himself has a powerful commitment to it, though he could not accept the Aristotelian position that it is through character that plot is actualized. In short, novels have characters, even if the world has not. What about time? It is, effectively, a human creation, according to Sartre, and he likes novels because they concern themselves only with human time, a faring forward irreversibly into a virgin future from ecstasy to ecstasy, in his word, from kairos to kairos in mine. The future is a fluid medium in which I try to actualize my potency, though the end is unattainable; the present is simply the pour-soi., 'human consciousness in its flight out of the past into the future.' The past is bundled into the en-soi, and has no relevance. 'What I was is not the foundation of what I am, any more than what I am is the foundation of what I shall be.' Now this is not novel-time. The faring forward is all right, and fits the old desire to know what happens next; but the denial of all causal relation between disparate kairoi, which is after all basic to Sartre's treatment of time, makes form impossible, and it would never occur to us that a book written to such a recipe, a set of discontinuous epiphanies, should be called a novel. Perhaps we could not even read it thus: the making of a novel is partly the achievement of readers as well as writers, and readers would constantly attempt to supply the very connections that the writer's programme suppresses. In all these ways, then, the novel falsifies the philosophy.

Frank Kermode
for-aristotle-literary-plot-was-analogous-to-plot-world-in-that-both-were-eductions-from-potency-matter-sartre-denies-this-for-world-specifically-denies-in-passage-just-referred-
?Earn cash when you save a quote by clicking
EARNED Load...
LEVEL : Load...