Usurp Quotes

Authors: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Categories: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
no-one-can-usurp-heights-but-those-to-whom-miseries-world-are-misery-will-not-let-them-rest-john-keats
a-book-is-machine-to-think-with-but-it-need-not-therefore-usurp-functions-either-bellows-locomotive-ivor-a-richards
but-i-suffer-not-a-woman-to-teach-nor-to-usurp-authority-over-the-man-but-to-be-in-silence
pride-causes-us-to-use-our-gifts-as-though-they-came-from-ourselves-not-benefits-received-from-god-to-usurp-our-benefactors-glory-bernard-clairvaux
pregnancy-seemed-like-tremendous-abdication-control-something-growing-inside-you-which-would-eventually-usurp-your-life-erica-jong
individual-believers-are-not-to-usurp-role-civil-government-judge-people-who-are-offensive-max-anders
paradoxically-when-females-reject-male-they-usurp-masculine-role-abandon-feminine-one-henry-makow
thunder-blood-night-must-usurp-our-parts-to-complete-make-up-catastrophe-this-great-piece-er-eddison
nothing-in-14th-amendment-in-any-other-constitutional-provision-suggests-that-president-may-usurp-legislative-power-to-prevent-violation-constitution
you-will-find-that-reason-which-always-ought-to-direct-mankind-seldom-does-but-that-passions-weaknesses-commonly-usurp-its-seat-rule-in-its-stead-philip-dormer-stanhope
kings-may-usurp-thrones-republics-may-be-established-but-town-scarcely-stirs-plassan-sleeps-while-paris-fights-emile-zola
meditation-is-tool-to-shake-yourself-awake-a-way-to-discover-what-you-love-a-practice-to-return-yourself-to-your-body-when-mind-medleys-threaten-to-geneen-roth
our-comfort-in-theological-traditions-should-never-usurp-our-desire-for-spiritual-truth-if-we-vigorously-pursue-rituals-rather-than-relational-experience-with-god-then-weve-misse
the-island-tonal-way-we-see-life-is-there-we-can-get-through-our-life-it-was-never-intended-to-become-dictator-that-would-usurp-all-other-views-frederick-lenz
theres-difference-between-clever-person-smart-one-smart-people-make-their-own-ways-clever-people-use-their-minds-to-usurp-opportunities-to-walk-on-paths-made-by-others-waheed-ibn
with-foreign-officials-come-foreign-merchants-with-foreign-merchants-come-foreign-soldiers-they-will-usurp-our-authority-influence-to-begin-with-in-course-time-our-guests-will-ha
when-you-ignore-your-belly-you-become-homeless-you-spend-your-life-trying-to-erase-your-own-existence-apologizing-for-yourself-feeling-like-ghost-eating-to-take-up-space-eating-t
To begin with, there is the frightful debauchery of taste that has already been effected by a century of mechanisation. This is almost too obvious and too generally admitted to need pointing out. But as a single instance, take taste in its narrowest sense - the taste for decent food. In the highly mechanical countries, thanks to tinned food, cold storage, synthetic flavouring matters, etc., the palate it almost a dead organ. As you can see by looking at any greengrocer's shop, what the majority of English people mean by an apple is a lump of highly-coloured cotton wool from America or Australia; they will devour these things, apparently with pleasure, and let the English apples rot under the trees. It is the shiny, standardized, machine-made look of the American apple that appeals to them; the superior taste of the English apple is something they simply do not notice. Or look at the factory-made, foil wrapped cheeses and 'blended' butter in an grocer's; look at the hideous rows of tins which usurp more and more of the space in any food-shop, even a dairy; look at a sixpenny Swiss roll or a twopenny ice-cream; look at the filthy chemical by-product that people will pour down their throats under the name of beer. Wherever you look you will see some slick machine-made article triumphing over the old-fashioned article that still tastes of something other than sawdust. And what applies to food applies also to furniture, houses, clothes, books, amusements and everything else that makes up our environment. These are now millions of people, and they are increasing every year, to whom the blaring of a radio is not only a more acceptable but a more normal background to their thoughts than the lowing of cattle or the song of birds. The mechanisation of the world could never proceed very far while taste, even the taste-buds of the tongue, remained uncorrupted, because in that case most of the products of the machine would be simply unwanted. In a healthy world there would be no demand for tinned food, aspirins, gramophones, gas-pipe chairs, machine guns, daily newspapers, telephones, motor-cars, etc. etc.; and on the other hand there would be a constant demand for the things the machine cannot produce. But meanwhile the machine is here, and its corrupting effects are almost irresistible. One inveighs against it, but one goes on using it. Even a bare-arse savage, given the change, will learn the vices of civilisation within a few months. Mechanisation leads to the decay of taste, the decay of taste leads to demand for machine-made articles and hence to more mechanisation, and so a vicious circle is established.

George Orwell
to-begin-with-there-is-frightful-debauchery-taste-that-has-already-been-effected-by-century-mechanisation-this-is-almost-too-obvious-too-generally-admitted-to-need-pointing-out-b
In this book, we have briefly touched on what are considered adequate and inadequate tests in science. Introspection, personal experience, and testimonials are all considered inadequate tests of claims about the nature of human behavior. Thus, it should not be surprising that conflict arises because these are precisely the types of evidence that nonpsychologist commentators have been using to support their statements about human behavior since long before a discipline of psychology existed. However, it should not be thought that I am recommending a sour, spoilsport role for the science of psychology. Quite the contrary. The actual findings of legitimate psychology are vastly more interesting and exciting than the repetitious gee-whiz pseudoscience of the media. Furthermore, it should not be thought that scientists are against fantasy and imagination. However, we want fancy and fantasy when we go to the movies or the theater-not when we go to the doctor's office, buy insurance, register our children for child care, fly in an airplane, or have our car serviced. We could add to this list going to a psychotherapist, having our learning-disabled child tested by a school psychologist, or taking a friend to suicide-prevention counseling at the university psychology clinic. Psychology, like other sciences, must remove fantasy, unfounded opinion, 'common sense,' commercial advertising claims, the advice of gurus, testimonials, and wishful thinking from its search for the truth. It is difficult for a science to have to tell parts of society that their thoughts and opinions are needed-but not here. Psychology is the latest of the sciences to be in this delicate position. The difference in time period for psychology, however, is relevant. Most sciences came of age during periods of elite control of the structures of society, when the opinion of the ordinary person made no difference. Psychology, on the other hand, is emerging in a media age of democracy and ignores public opinion at its own peril. Many psychologists are now taking greater pains to remedy the discipline's lamentable record in public communication. As more psychologists take on a public communication role, the conflicts with those who confuse a personal psychology with scientific psychology are bound to increase. Not everyone is a physicist, even though we all hold intuitive physical theories. But in giving up the claim that our personal physical theories must usurp scientific physics, we make way for a true science of the physical universe whose theories, because science is public, will be available to us all. Likewise, everyone is not a psychologist. But the facts and theories uncovered by the science of psychology are available to be put to practical ends and to enrich the understanding of all of us.

Keith E. Stanovich
in-this-book-we-have-briefly-touched-on-what-are-considered-adequate-inadequate-tests-in-science-introspection-personal-experience-testimonials-are-all-considered-inadequate-test
?Earn cash when you save a quote by clicking
EARNED Load...
LEVEL : Load...