Excludes Quotes

Authors: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Categories: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
anytime-you-have-thought-for-example-that-excludes-someone-if-you-have-religion-that-excludes-someone-then-youve-really-left-god-behind-youve-wayne-dyer
we-have-not-in-fact-proved-that-science-excludes-miracles-we-have-only-proved-that-question-miracles-like-innumerable-other-questions-excludes-c-s-lewis
there-ought-to-be-things-we-should-like-to-do-cannot-do-because-our-charitable-expenditures-excludes-them-c-s-lewis
the-first-sense-mutual-love-excludes-other-feelings-it-will-have-soul-all-to-itself-george-eliot
the-more-thoroughly-i-conduct-scientific-research-more-i-believe-that-science-excludes-atheism
kitsch-excludes-everything-from-its-purview-which-is-essentially-unacceptable-in-human-existence-milan-kundera
poetry-absolves-spirituality-from-dividedness-religions-provides-us-with-sanctuary-that-excludes-no-one-vanna-bonta
the-orthodox-jewish-faith-practically-excludes-woman-from-religious-life
no-form-government-can-survive-that-excludes-dictatorship-when-life-nation-is-at-stake-clinton-rossiter
the-most-colorful-thing-in-world-is-black-white-it-contains-all-colors-at-same-time-excludes-all-vikrmn
to-be-admitted-to-natures-hearth-costs-nothing-none-is-excluded-but-excludes-himself-you-have-only-to-push-aside-the-curtain
i-submit-on-other-hand-most-respectfully-that-constitution-not-merely-does-not-affirm-that-principle-but-on-contrary-altogether-excludes-it
i-dont-think-that-just-because-lot-my-music-has-quieter-aesthetic-it-excludes-me-from-achieving-that-in-live-setting-from-being-dangerous-j-tillman
to-spare-oneself-from-grief-at-all-cost-can-be-achieved-only-at-the-price-of-total-detachment-which-excludes-the-ability-to-experience-happiness
the-author-relates-george-bernard-shaws-sentiments-that-polite-conversation-excludes-only-two-subjects-that-matter-religion-politics-lyle-w-dorsett
there-is-land-pure-delight-where-saints-immortal-reign-infinite-day-excludes-night-and-pleasures-banish-pain-isaac-watts
death-is-genuine-fact-that-it-excludes-falsehoods-betrays-its-emptiness-it-is-touchstone-that-proves-gold-dishonors-baser-metal-nathaniel-hawthorne
secular-humanism-is-opposed-to-other-religions-it-actively-rejects-excludes-attempts-to-eliminate-traditional-theism-from-meaningful-participation-in-harvey-cox
the-view-life-i-communicate-in-my-pictures-excludes-sordid-ugly-i-paint-life-as-i-would-like-it-to-be-norman-rockwell
a-way-life-which-excludes-realm-unknown-mysterious-is-simply-not-in-harmony-with-life-itself-yehudi-menuhin
i-have-not-that-joy-in-holy-ghost-no-settled-lasting-joy-nor-have-i-such-peace-as-excludes-possibility-either-fear-doubt
if-solitude-deprives-benefit-advice-it-also-excludes-from-mischief-flattery-but-absence-others-applause-is-generally-supplied-by-flattery-william-benton-clulow
men-who-hold-theory-church-which-excludes-from-communion-those-whom-they-admit-to-have-spirit-christ-simply-proclaim-that-their-theory-is-in-flat-contradiction-to-spiritual-fact
i-do-not-believe-that-defending-traditional-marriage-between-one-man-one-woman-excludes-anybody-usurps-anybodys-civil-rights-denies-anybody-their-civil-rights
whenever-philosophy-has-taken-into-its-plan-religion-it-has-ended-in-skepticism-whenever-religion-excludes-philosophy-spirit-free-inquiry-it-leads-samuel-taylor-coleridge
life-always-involves-some-logic-in-its-manifestations-logic-as-rule-excludes-versatility-life-from-its-considerations-raheel-farooq
we-must-cease-once-for-all-to-describe-effects-power-in-negative-terms-it-excludes-it-represses-in-fact-power-produces-it-produces-reality-it-produces-domains-objects-rituals-tru
the-mind-generally-takes-up-various-objects-runs-into-all-sorts-things-that-is-lower-state-there-is-higher-state-mind-when-it-takes-up-one-object-swami-vivekananda
As in the political sphere, the child is taught that he is free, a democrat, with a free will and a free mind, lives in a free country, makes his own decisions. At the same time he is a prisoner of the assumptions and dogmas of his time, which he does not question, because he has never been told they exist. By the time a young person has reached the age when he has to choose (we still take it for granted that a choice is inevitable) between the arts and the sciences, he often chooses the arts because he feels that here is humanity, freedom, choice. He does not know that he is already moulded by a system: he does not know that the choice itself is the result of a false dichotomy rooted in the heart of our culture. Those who do sense this, and who don't wish to subject themselves to further moulding, tend to leave, in a half-unconscious, instinctive attempt to find work where they won't be divided against themselves. With all our institutions, from the police force to academia, from medicine to politics, we give little attention to the people who leave-that process of elimination that goes on all the time and which excludes, very early, those likely to be original and reforming, leaving those attracted to a thing because that is what they are already like. A young policeman leaves the Force saying he doesn't like what he has to do. A young teacher leaves teaching, here idealism snubbed. This social mechanism goes almost unnoticed-yet it is as powerful as any in keeping our institutions rigid and oppressive.

Doris Lessing
as-in-political-sphere-child-is-taught-that-he-is-free-democrat-with-free-will-free-mind-lives-in-free-country-makes-his-own-decisions-at-same-time-he-is-prisoner-assumptions-dog
concerning-phosphorescent-bodies-in-particular-to-uranium-salts-whose-phosphorescence-has-brief-duration-with-double-sulfate-uranium-potassium-i-was-able-to-perform-following-exp
Aside from wanting to write cracking good books that turn children into lifelong readers, I really want to create stories that enable kids to LOOK at the world around them. To see it for what it is, with wide open, wondering eyes. Our mass media is so horribly skewed. It presents this idea of 'normalcy' which excludes and marginalises so many for an idea of commercial viability which is really nothing but blinkered prejudice. People who are black and Asian and Middle Eastern and Hispanic, people who are gay or transgendered or genderqueer, people who have disabilities, disfigurements or illnesses - all have this vision of a world which does not include them shoved down their throats almost 24-7, and they're told 'No one wants to see stories about people like you. Films and TV shows about people like you won't make money. Stories about straight, white, cisgendered, able-bodied people are universal and everyone likes them. You are small and useless and unattractive and you don't matter.' My worry is that this warped version of 'normal' eventually forms those very same blinkers on children's eyes, depriving them of their ability to see anyone who isn't the same as them, preventing them from developing the ability to empathise with and appreciate and take joy in the lives and experiences of people who are different from them. If Shadows on the Moon - or anything I write - causes a young person to look at their own life, or the life of another, and think, 'Maybe being different is cool' I will die a happy writer. -Guest blog - what diversity means to me

Zoe« Marriott
aside-from-wanting-to-write-cracking-good-books-that-turn-children-into-lifelong-readers-i-really-want-to-create-stories-that-enable-kids-to-look-at-world-around-them-to-see-it-f
The difficulties connected with my criterion of demarcation (D) are important, but must not be exaggerated. It is vague, since it is a methodological rule, and since the demarcation between science and nonscience is vague. But it is more than sharp enough to make a distinction between many physical theories on the one hand, and metaphysical theories, such as psychoanalysis, or Marxism (in its present form), on the other. This is, of course, one of my main theses; and nobody who has not understood it can be said to have understood my theory. The situation with Marxism is, incidentally, very different from that with psychoanalysis. Marxism was once a scientific theory: it predicted that capitalism would lead to increasing misery and, through a more or less mild revolution, to socialism; it predicted that this would happen first in the technically highest developed countries; and it predicted that the technical evolution of the 'means of production' would lead to social, political, and ideological developments, rather than the other way round. But the (so-called) socialist revolution came first in one of the technically backward countries. And instead of the means of production producing a new ideology, it was Lenin's and Stalin's ideology that Russia must push forward with its industrialization ('Socialism is dictatorship of the proletariat plus electrification') which promoted the new development of the means of production. Thus one might say that Marxism was once a science, but one which was refuted by some of the facts which happened to clash with its predictions (I have here mentioned just a few of these facts). However, Marxism is no longer a science; for it broke the methodological rule that we must accept falsification, and it immunized itself against the most blatant refutations of its predictions. Ever since then, it can be described only as nonscience-as a metaphysical dream, if you like, married to a cruel reality. Psychoanalysis is a very different case. It is an interesting psychological metaphysics (and no doubt there is some truth in it, as there is so often in metaphysical ideas), but it never was a science. There may be lots of people who are Freudian or Adlerian cases: Freud himself was clearly a Freudian case, and Adler an Adlerian case. But what prevents their theories from being scientific in the sense here described is, very simply, that they do not exclude any physically possible human behaviour. Whatever anybody may do is, in principle, explicable in Freudian or Adlerian terms. (Adler's break with Freud was more Adlerian than Freudian, but Freud never looked on it as a refutation of his theory.) The point is very clear. Neither Freud nor Adler excludes any particular person's acting in any particular way, whatever the outward circumstances. Whether a man sacrificed his life to rescue a drowning, child (a case of sublimation) or whether he murdered the child by drowning him (a case of repression) could not possibly be predicted or excluded by Freud's theory; the theory was compatible with everything that could happen-even without any special immunization treatment. Thus while Marxism became non-scientific by its adoption of an immunizing strategy, psychoanalysis was immune to start with, and remained so. In contrast, most physical theories are pretty free of immunizing tactics and highly falsifiable to start with. As a rule, they exclude an infinity of conceivable possibilities.

Karl R. Popper
the-difficulties-connected-with-my-criterion-demarcation-d-are-important-but-must-not-be-exaggerated-it-is-vague-since-it-is-methodological-rule-since-demarcation-between-science
?Earn cash when you save a quote by clicking
EARNED Load...
LEVEL : Load...