Massacres Quotes

Authors: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Categories: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
in-its-history-europe-has-committed-so-many-massacres-and-horrors-that-it-should-bow-its-own-head-in-shame
in-history-battles-wars-massacres-civilians-were-main-reason-revolutions-success-mf-moonzajer
students-history-are-horrorstruck-at-massacres-old-but-in-shambles-men-are-being-murdered-today-herman-melville
in-stress-pressurecooker-like-america-i-believe-we-will-see-more-more-shooting-massacres-violence-is-in-our-cultural-dna-bryant-mcgill
according-to-reports-we-have-gathered-mostly-from-refugees-it-appears-that-around-10000-people-have-been-killed-in-more-than-100-massacres-the-final-geoff-hoon
the-existing-system-will-be-quickest-most-radically-overthrown-by-annihilation-its-exponents-therefore-massacres-enemies-people-must-be-set-in-motion
i-vividly-remember-stories-my-grandfather-told-me-about-carnage-first-world-war-which-people-tend-to-forget-was-one-worst-massacres-in-human-history
the-civil-war-in-rwanda-other-ethnic-massacres-were-integral-part-us-foreign-policy-carefully-staged-in-accordance-with-precise-strategic-economic-michel-chossudovsky
but-i-am-armenian-and-i-understand-what-it-is-to-lose-a-country-and-lose-a-family-and-have-massacres-and-genocides-and-everything-against-my-people
why-does-tragedy-like-911-change-everything-about-air-travel-but-numerous-gun-massacres-change-nothing-justine-bateman
we-were-born-risen-apes-not-fallen-angels-apes-were-armed-killers-besides-and-what-shall-we-wonder-at-our-murders-massacres-missiles-our-irreconcilable-regiments-robert-ardrey
whenever-i-happen-to-be-in-city-any-size-i-marvel-that-riots-do-not-break-out-everyday-massacres-unspeakable-carnage-doomsday-chaos-how-can-many-human-beings-coexist-in-space-con
this-war-will-be-war-extermination-momentous-massacre-which-will-be-spoken-like-mongol-massacres-crusades-by-arab-league-secretary-general-abdul-rahman-azzam-sol-stern
one-expects-decent-people-to-stand-up-for-good-all-decent-people-shut-their-doors-hide-behind-them-as-decent-people-do-massacres-could-never-happen-if-it-werent-for-decent-people
i-remember-one-gentleman-objected-to-christian-faith-that-it-made-men-insolent-quarrelsom-illnaturd-from-whence-i-concluded-as-i-told-him-that-he-had-never-read-over-gospells-tru
{From Lindsey's address at the funeral of renowned scientist Luther Burbank. Burbank was one of the most beloved people in the early 20th century due to his countless contributions to humanity, but when, in an interview, he revealed that he was an atheist, the public quickly turned on him, sending him hundreds of death threats. Upset and grief stricken, the kind-hearted Burbank tried to respond to every letter amiably, a task that ultimately led to his death}... Luther Burbank had a philosophy that actually works for human betterment, that dares to challenge the superstition, hypocrisy, and sham, which so often have worked for cruelties, inquisitions, wars and massacres. Superstition that stood across the road of Progress, commanded, not by a god or gods, but the meanest devils that we know-Ignorance, Intolerance, Bigotry, Fanaticism, and Hate. The prejudiced beneficiaries of organized theology refused to see what Burbank, the gifted child of Nature, saw with a vision as crystal as theirs is dense and dark. And so they assailed him. One of the saddest spectacles of our times is the effort of hidebound theologians, still desperately trying to chain us to the past-in other forms that would still invoke the inquisitions, the fears, and the bigotries of the dark ages, and keep the world in chains. The chains of lies, hypocrisies, taboos, and the superstitions, fostered by the dying, but still the organized, relentless outworn theology of another age. They refuse to see that in their stupid lust for power they are endangering all that is good.

Ben Lindsey
from-lindseys-address-at-funeral-renowned-scientist-luther-burbank-burbank-was-one-most-beloved-people-in-early-20th-century-due-to-his-countless-contributions-to-humanity-but-wh
Killing, raping and looting have been common practices in religious societies, and often carried out with clerical sanction. The catalogue of notorious barbarities - wars and massacres, acts of terrorism, the Inquisition, the Crusades, the chopping off of thieves' hands, the slicing off of clitorises and labia majora, the use of gang rape as punishment, and manifold other savageries committed in the name of one faith or another - attests to religion's longstanding propensity to induce barbarity, or at the very least to give it free rein. The Bible and the Quran have served to justify these atrocities and more, with women and gay people suffering disproportionately. There is a reason the Middle Ages in Europe were long referred to as the Dark Ages; the millennium of theocratic rule that ended only with the Renaissance (that is, with Europe's turn away from God toward humankind) was a violent time. Morality arises out of our innate desire for safety, stability and order, without which no society can function; basic moral precepts (that murder and theft are wrong, for example) antedated religion. Those who abstain from crime solely because they fear divine wrath, and not because they recognize the difference between right and wrong, are not to be lauded, much less trusted. Just which practices are moral at a given time must be a matter of rational debate. The 'master-slave' ethos - obligatory obeisance to a deity - pervading the revealed religions is inimical to such debate. We need to chart our moral course as equals, or there can be no justice.

Jeffrey Tayler
killing-raping-looting-have-been-common-practices-in-religious-societies-often-carried-out-with-clerical-sanction-the-catalogue-notorious-barbarities-wars-massacres-acts-terroris
He was perfectly astonished with the historical account gave him of our affairs during the last century; protesting 'it was only a heap of conspiracies, rebellions, murders, massacres, revolutions, banishments, the very worst effects that avarice, faction, hypocrisy, perfidiousness, cruelty, rage, madness, hatred, envy, lust, malice, and ambition, could produce.' His majesty, in another audience, was at the pains to recapitulate the sum of all I had spoken; compared the questions he made with the answers I had given; then taking me into his hands, and stroking me gently, delivered himself in these words, which I shall never forget, nor the manner he spoke them in: 'My little friend Grildrig, you have made a most admirable panegyric upon your country; you have clearly proved, that ignorance, idleness, and vice, are the proper ingredients for qualifying a legislator; that laws are best explained, interpreted, and applied, by those whose interest and abilities lie in perverting, confounding, and eluding them. I observe among you some lines of an institution, which, in its original, might have been tolerable, but these half erased, and the rest wholly blurred and blotted by corruptions. It does not appear, from all you have said, how any one perfection is required toward the procurement of any one station among you; much less, that men are ennobled on account of their virtue; that priests are advanced for their piety or learning; soldiers, for their conduct or valour; judges, for their integrity; senators, for the love of their country; or counsellors for their wisdom. As for yourself, ' continued the king, 'who have spent the greatest part of your life in travelling, I am well disposed to hope you may hitherto have escaped many vices of your country. But by what I have gathered from your own relation, and the answers I have with much pains wrung and extorted from you, I cannot but conclude the bulk of your natives to be the most pernicious race of little odious vermin that nature ever suffered to crawl upon the surface of the earth.

Jonathan Swift
he-was-perfectly-astonished-with-historical-account-gave-him-our-affairs-during-last-century-protesting-it-was-only-heap-conspiracies-rebellions-murders-massacres-revolutions-ban
There are certain men who are sacrosanct in history; you touch on the truth of them at your peril. These are such men as Socrates and Plato, Pericles and Alexander, Caesar and Augustus, Marcus Aurelius and Trajan, Martel and Charlemagne, Edward the Confessor and William of Falaise, St. Louis and Richard and Tancred, Erasmus and Bacon, Galileo and Newton, Voltaire and Rousseau, Harvey and Darwin, Nelson and Wellington. In America, Penn and Franklin, Jefferson and Jackson and Lee. There are men better than these who are not sacrosanct, who may be challenged freely. But these men may not be. Albert Pike has been elevated to this sacrosanct company, though of course to a minor rank. To challenge his rank is to be overwhelmed by a torrent of abuse, and we challenge him completely. Looks are important to these elevated. Albert Pike looked like Michelangelo's Moses in contrived frontier costume. Who could distrust that big man with the great beard and flowing hair and godly glance? If you dislike the man and the type, then he was pompous, empty, provincial and temporal, dishonest, and murderous. But if you like the man and the type, then he was impressive, untrammeled, a man of the right place and moment, flexible or sophisticated, and firm. These are the two sides of the same handful of coins. He stole (diverted) Indian funds and used them to bribe doubtful Indian leaders. He ordered massacres of women and children (exemplary punitive operations). He lied like a trooper (he was a trooper). He effected assassinations (removal of semi-military obstructions). He forged names to treaties (astute frontier politics). He was part of a weird plot by men of both the North and South to extinguish the Indians whoever should win the war (devotion to the ideal of national growth ). He personally arranged twelve separate civil wars among the Indians (the removal of the unfit). After all, those were war years; and he did look like Moses, and perhaps he sounded like him.

R.A. Lafferty
there-are-certain-men-who-are-sacrosanct-in-history-you-touch-on-truth-them-at-your-peril-these-are-such-men-as-socrates-plato-pericles-alexander-caesar-augustus-marcus-aurelius-
Hitherto, the Palestinians had been relatively immune to this Allahu Akhbar style. I thought this was a hugely retrograde development. I said as much to Edward. To reprint Nazi propaganda and to make a theocratic claim to Spanish soil was to be a protofascist and a supporter of 'Caliphate' imperialism: it had nothing at all to do with the mistreatment of the Palestinians. Once again, he did not exactly disagree. But he was anxious to emphasize that the Israelis had often encouraged Hamas as a foil against Fatah and the PLO. This I had known since seeing the burning out of leftist Palestinians by Muslim mobs in Gaza as early as 1981. Yet once again, it seemed Edward could only condemn Islamism if it could somehow be blamed on either Israel or the United States or the West, and not as a thing in itself. He sometimes employed the same sort of knight's move when discussing other Arabist movements, excoriating Saddam Hussein's Ba'ath Party, for example, mainly because it had once enjoyed the support of the CIA. But when Saddam was really being attacked, as in the case of his use of chemical weapons on noncombatants at Halabja, Edward gave second-hand currency to the falsified story that it had 'really' been the Iranians who had done it. If that didn't work, well, hadn't the United States sold Saddam the weaponry in the first place? Finally, and always-and this question wasn't automatically discredited by being a change of subject-what about Israel's unwanted and ugly rule over more and more millions of non-Jews? I evolved a test for this mentality, which I applied to more people than Edward. What would, or did, the relevant person say when the United States intervened to stop the massacres and dispossessions in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo? Here were two majority-Muslim territories and populations being vilely mistreated by Orthodox and Catholic Christians. There was no oil in the region. The state interests of Israel were not involved (indeed, Ariel Sharon publicly opposed the return of the Kosovar refugees to their homes on the grounds that it set an alarming-I want to say 'unsettling'-precedent). The usual national-security 'hawks, ' like Henry Kissinger, were also strongly opposed to the mission. One evening at Edward's apartment, with the other guest being the mercurial, courageous Azmi Bishara, then one of the more distinguished Arab members of the Israeli parliament, I was finally able to leave the arguing to someone else. Bishara [... ] was quite shocked that Edward would not lend public support to Clinton for finally doing the right thing in the Balkans. Why was he being so stubborn? I had begun by then-belatedly you may say-to guess. Rather like our then-friend Noam Chomsky, Edward in the final instance believed that if the United States was doing something, then that thing could not by definition be a moral or ethical action.

Christopher Hitchens
hitherto-palestinians-had-been-relatively-immune-to-this-allahu-akhbar-style-i-thought-this-was-hugely-retrograde-development-i-said-as-much-to-edward-to-reprint-nazi-propaganda-
?Earn cash when you save a quote by clicking
EARNED Load...
LEVEL : Load...